The 4 Best Digital Pianos With Speakers That Actually Sound Good
Great samples through bad speakers sound like great samples through a pillow. I listened to four pianos' built-in speakers critically.
I've lost count of how many times a student has sat down at my P-45, played a chord, and then looked at me like I'd tricked them. The sound coming out of the built-in speakers is warm, clear, and big enough to fill my home studio. Then they go home, buy a cheaper keyboard with more impressive specs on paper, and text me a week later saying everything sounds like it's coming through a pillow. I hear that exact complaint at least once a month. The specs said 128-note polyphony and 20 sounds. The speakers said nothing, because they were garbage.
Here's what I've learned from owning twelve digital pianos and teaching on them for 25 years: the built-in speaker system is the most ignored spec on the entire product page. Everyone obsesses over the action, the samples, the polyphony count. Nobody asks what the speakers actually sound like at half volume in a living room. They assume that if the piano sound is good, the speakers must be fine. That's wrong. I've played a $1,200 keyboard with a beautiful grand piano sample that sounded like a smartphone speaker because the amp was tinny and the cabinet was cheap. I've also played a $500 slab that made me double-check I wasn't hearing things. The speakers are the final filter. Great samples through bad speakers sound like great samples through a pillow.
So I spent a month with four keyboards that claim to have good built-in speakers. Same test every time: the Bach Prelude in C for clarity, the Chopin Nocturne in E-flat for soft dynamics, and a blues improvisation for punch. I measured the max volume with a dB meter from three feet away. I played at low volume to hear if the speakers hissed or buzzed. I played at high volume to hear if the cabinet rattled. I kept a notebook with numbers, because that's how I trust anything.
The Yamaha P-45 is the baseline, and it's still the best value in the entire category. I've owned mine for four years. The action has gotten mushier and the black keys have developed a faint clicking sound that's mechanical, not electronic. I'll tell you that until I'm blue in the face. But the speakers? They still sound better than most keyboards twice the price. The P-45 pushes about 12 watts through two speakers, which sounds like nothing on paper. In practice, it's enough to fill a 12 by 14 foot room with a warm, balanced piano tone. No harsh highs, no muddy lows, no cabinet buzz at moderate volume. It's not going to shake the walls, but it's honest. The sound is authentic, the key feel is right, and it's simple. For around $500, that's a winner winner. My only real criticism is that Yamaha hasn't updated this design in years, and they've gotten away with it because nobody else has caught up at this price point.
Then there's the Casio PX-S1100, which is the P-45's most serious challenger. It's about $700, and it's thinner and lighter than the Yamaha, which matters if you're moving it around. The action is genuinely good, arguably better than the P-45's when both are new. The speakers are the interesting part. Casio put the speakers facing upward, which is a design choice that works better than I expected. The sound projects directly at you instead of bouncing off the wall behind the keyboard. It's a different experience, more immediate, more present. The tone is slightly brighter than the Yamaha, which some people will prefer. I measured 84 dB at max, a few decibels louder than the P-45. But there's a catch. At higher volumes, the cabinet vibrates. I noticed it on the Chopin, where the sustained chords in the left hand caused a faint buzzing from the case. It's not enough to ruin the experience, but it's there. At normal practice volume, it's fine. Push it and you'll hear it. For the price difference, I'd still take the P-45 unless you really need the slim profile. The Casio is a good keyboard. It's just not $200 better.
The Roland FP-30X is the one that surprised me. It's $800, which puts it in a weird middle ground. The action is the best of the four, no question. Roland's PHA-4 keybed is properly good. Fast repetition, even weight across all 88 keys, and a satisfying bottom to the key travel. I played the blues improvisation on it and forgot I was testing speakers. That's the highest compliment I can give. The speakers are also the best in this group. 11 watts through two speakers, which is less than the Casio, but the placement and tuning matter more than the number. The sound is fuller, with a stronger low end. The Chopin Nocturne sounded genuinely beautiful, which is rare for a slab in this price range. My complaint is that at $800, you're getting close to the point where you could buy a cheaper slab and a pair of decent studio monitors. I measured the FP-30X at 82 dB max, which is fine, but I've heard $150 powered monitors blow it away. The built-in speakers are good for practice. They're not good enough to justify the premium over the P-45 if all you care about is the sound. The action is the reason to buy the Roland. The speakers are just a bonus.
The last one is the one I want to criticize, because it's popular and I think it's overrated. The Alesis Recital Pro is a $400 keyboard that gets recommended everywhere. It has 88 weighted keys, 12 sounds, and a claimed 20 watts of speaker power. On paper, it should beat the P-45. In reality, it doesn't. The speakers are harsh. The high end has a metallic edge that I found fatiguing after ten minutes of practice. The low end is muddy, which makes the bass notes in the Chopin sound like a dull thud instead of a tone. I measured 86 dB at max, which is louder than the Yamaha, but loudness isn't the same as quality. Playing the Bach Prelude, the clarity I get on the P-45 was just gone. The notes blended together into a smear. And the action, which I've also tested separately, is decent but not in the same league as the Yamaha. The Alesis is a case of specs beating feel. It looks good in a comparison chart. It doesn't hold up in a practice room. I've had three students buy it because of the price and the wattage numbers, and all three upgraded within a year. That's a $400 mistake that costs more than the $500 Yamaha would have cost in the first place. Cost per day math, it's not even close.
The contrarian take I'll offer is this: the built-in speakers on any of these keyboards are the wrong thing to obsess over if you're serious about sound. The P-45's speakers are good for what they are, but I use mine as a MIDI controller connected to Pianoteq on my laptop. A free VST will blow the built-in sounds out of the water, and a $150 pair of studio monitors will make any of these keyboards sound like a $2,000 cabinet model. The speakers on the keyboard itself are for convenience, not for quality. They'll tide you over for practice. They won't give you a concert grand experience, no matter what the marketing page claims. I've played $4,000 digital pianos with elaborate speaker systems built into the cabinet, and they sound nice. They don't sound 8x better than a $500 slab through decent monitors. The cabinet is furniture. The speakers are a convenience. The action is the instrument.
If you're buying for a kid, the speakers matter less than the weight and the learning modes. A semi-weighted keyboard like the RockJam 61-key kit, around $130 with the stand and the stool, is fine for a first instrument. The speakers are adequate for a bedroom. The included headphones are garbage, and I've had them arrive broken in half, so buy a separate pair. The product photos are also misleading, showing a tablet and apps that make it look like the keyboard has a built-in display. It doesn't. But for a 10-year-old who wants to mess around, it's fine. If they stick with it, upgrade to the P-45. If they're serious from day one, skip the RockJam entirely.
The bottom line is simple. If you want a digital piano with speakers that actually sound good, the Yamaha P-45 is the one to buy. It's $500, the speakers are honest, and the action is pretty darn close to a real piano. The Roland FP-30X is better if you have the budget and you care about the action more than the price. The Casio is a solid alternative if you want something slim. The Alesis is a pass, and I'd tell anyone who asks to save up another hundred dollars and get the Yamaha. I've owned mine for four years, it's mushier than it was, and I still recommend it to every student who walks through my door. That's the test that matters.
Found This Helpful?
Have questions about digital pianos & keyboards? We reply to every email.
Email Us